9 thoughts on “Senate panel hearing on aviation safety after fatal crashes”

1. The safety option being discussed is an angle of attack indicator which will mean nothing to pilots who are not trained extensively through the air force in very specific aircraft

2. You would think the specialist giving evidence would have researched the Boeing B737 MAX manuals, particularly the abnormal/emergency procedures, prior to appearing!

3. When and who determines if an amended type certificate process is appropriate or if a new type certificate and certification process should be conducted?

4. Why arent planes designed in Ethiopia and Indonesia? Exactly. This is the latest example of what happens when you let the mob belch their paranoia. If you DONT bother to LEARN the machine…whitey

   ISNT gonna make buttons that solve EVERYTHING. Mkay.. Lets all let go of the paternalism. THYE FAILED to LEARN the machine. Notice no one else crashed. Yeh, tells you everything.

5. Boycott African nations that want DUmbed Down machines.

6. @1:47:25 What a prick, this FAA chairman is a sleeze bag. "I can't believe airlines put their passengers at risk by opting not to take a safety feature" That is what he said. Why did the FAA allow a less safe plane than possible be certified. A less safe plane than possible ! Safety features must not ever be allowed to be presented as optional.

7. If you can't convince them confuse them.

8. Why do the senate members rely on the media reports?

9. ISMH do we have the INFO from overseas yet, NO! to learn why things happened overseas? Taking so long than here in the United Stated and FAA. Not Boeing faults anyway.. Piolets overseas issues and airlines…